Sunday, May 09, 2010

It was not just the tree that killed Pavit Singh

On the evening/night of 2nd May 2010, an accident took place at 3rd Avenue Besant Nagar. The stretch of the road is also referred to as the Besant Avenue. The accident spot is just off the curve around the Besant Scout Camp, when you travelling from Adyar towards Besant Nagar.

The accident was quite gruesome and involved a car crashing into a tree. The driver of the car, Pavit Singh, 21 years old, died on the spot. I express my heart-felt condolences to his near and dear.

I am not writing this post as a eulogy to the dead man, because, I just don't know who he is. I am writing this because, I am not happy with the outcome of this tragic event.

What was the outcome? Well, the Police and much of the public have arrived at the conclusion that the accident took place because of the tree that was in the middle of the road and the fatality ensued because the driver wasn’t wearing a seat belt. And the Police have gone ahead and cut down the trees. But, I beg to differ. The reason in my firm opinion is rash driving.

I have been travelling on that road for practically my entire life. I have been driving quite regularly too on that road. And if you drive with discipline, it is one of the most pleasurable drives you can get in the city, what with the smooth surface and dense foliage in the form of old trees. Even in the day time during peak summers, one can find a distinct difference in the temperature there.

However, the youth have been known to drive very indiscriminately on that stretch. The bikers are especially the worst of the lot. With the improving economy in the last few years, more cars have also joined the list.

The other fact is that, a lot of these drivers and riders are new to the stretch. They generally see a pretty wide stretch of good road with not much of traffic. That somehow triggers them to show off their speeding capabilities. And they naturally miss out the continuous warning signs placed on the road. The warning signs basically ask the motorists not to speed and also warn them about the presence of trees.

But once you are into speeding, you don't care about the signs. How can you care when you don't read them right? And adding to the thrill is the presence of a pretty good curve on the road near the Scout Camp. And the issue comes up right there.

Once you round the curve, the experienced (those who use that road regularly) motorists tend to keep to the middle of the road, because there are 2 big trees that are away from the “platform” and pretty much on the road. One of them in fact has a 2 feet gap between the platform and its trunk.

I have often seen the inexperienced drivers try to overtake other vehicles on the curve, from the left. They invariably head straight into the tree and then swerve right, into the regular lane to avoid it. This obviously causes trouble to the vehicle that is already there to the right.

Now coming back to this case, Pavit Singh is reported to have been driving a car with at least 4 others in his car. Some reports in fact suggest that there were 6. I heard from my friend that he was driving a new Maruti Ritz (he saw the damaged car near the Besant Nagar Police Station). And most of the passengers in the car were girls. And the average age of everyone in the car was 21 or 22. The accident took place late on Sunday night, because the reports appeared only on Tuesday in the local newspapers.

To me, that clearly says that the driver wouldn’t have been driving in a disciplined state, because, as a long term resident of the area (his house was in Indra Nagar and did his schooling in Adyar), he would be well aware of the tree. I am not alluding that he was under the influence of alcohol, but going by the other data available, I am willing to conclude that he was just showing off his driving skills to his buddies.

The tree just didn’t spring up when he took the curve. So don't blame the tree as being the cause of the accident. He wasn’t wearing a seat-belt and yes, that would have ensured the fatality. But, why wasn’t he wearing one? Do you know that Seat-belts are mandatory for the front occupants of the car and this is a rule ratified by the Supreme Court more than 10 years ago? So, why weren’t the Police booking people for not wearing their seat-belt?

And now everyone’s launching a campaign for educating people about wearing seat-belt. Why educate I ask? Just enforce the law!

I said earlier that this is not a eulogy for Pavit Singh. But after reading this rant, you may well think that this is a tirade against him. No, that is not my intent either. I have used this case of Pavit Singh, though it can very well be applied in toto to countless AmitsRajendransBashas and Daniels who drive badly.

My target audience for the rant is the Police who acted swiftly in ensuring that the trees in contention were cut off. If at all they were so concerned all these years, why did they not cut the tree earlier? If there were cases stopping them from cutting it, have they acted in contempt of court now? If there were protests to protect the trees, why didn’t they increase the patrolling on that stretch? Why didn’t they ensure that there was no speeding on that road? Why didn’t they put up speed-breakers on either side of the curve on both lanes? And why didn’t they put additional speed-breakers in the middle of that curve? Did they simply decide that the trees had to go and were waiting for a fatal accident to happen?

I will tell you this. Now that the trees are not there, more moronic motorists are going to be speeding up faster on that stretch. Mark my words, the next fatal accident is only around the corner – pun unintended.

P.S: You can read about the accident and the follow-up actions in these websites.

http://www.hindu.com/2010/05/04/stories/2010050460460300.htm

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/Dont-miss-the-tree-for-the-road/articleshow/5887902.cms

http://lite.epaper.timesofindia.com/getpage.aspx?pageid=2&pagesize=&edid=&edlabel=TOICH&mydateHid=04-05-2010&pubname=&edname=&publabel=TOI

http://lite.epaper.timesofindia.com/getpage.aspx?pageid=2&pagesize=&edid=&edlabel=TOICH&mydateHid=05-05-2010&pubname=&edname=&publabel=TOI

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/Victims-kin-plan-road-safety-drive/articleshow/5904939.cms

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pavit-Singh-SeatBelt-Campaign/119780684713527

7 comments:

YouKnowWho said...

I thought there were huge axle breakers on both sides of the curves and in the curve itself.

However, there are two aspects to this...
1. Removing any obvious obstacles from a road - you were against cutting down the tree or the effectiveness of the measure.
I totally disagree with you on this. If there is a tree on the road - irrespective of if it's in the corner or a foot from the footpath - the mere presence of an obstacle is setting the driver up for a collision. So, either reroute the road (which I remember there was no place around or without cutting other trees) or cut the tree. Sadly, the tree has to go. No amount of white paint or flourescent paint on the tree is going to matter.

You know the road well but you don't have to be drunk to hit a tree on the road (albeit to the side) - you may lose concentration for a quick minute, right? (a phone call, blinding headlights or in your case a Tamanna poster)

Also, don't agree with "removing the obstacle only makes them go faster" argument. If that's the case then you wouldn't have freeways and speed limits. Crazy guys will find ways to kill themselves and others.

2. The other aspect I do agree with. Finding ways to curtail the speed and fine speeders is always welcome but I guess your point is that it's either not happening or not effective.

The police should probably build a bunglaow to house the latest tamil movie siren in the Scouts camp area. There will be a lot of drive bys but I can guarantee that they won't be fast.

Martyn SIngh said...

I apologize but I dont agree with your statement that " It was not just the tree that killed Pavit Singh. First of all let me ask you a simple question? what is a road meant for? for vehicles to run on or to plant trees? There are many sidelines near the pavement or footpath to plant the tree but What was it doing in the middle of the road? The tree had no business whatsoever to be there. Why wasnt there any signboard warning of a tree? It really pains me to see the foolishness of some people choosing to protect trees over people. Please remember A persons life is much more precious than a tree. We can plant millions of trees but can we get an awesome person like Pavit back? Most unlikely right.

Jawaman said...

Martyn,

I fully agree that roads are not meant for trees. But the tree in contention didn’t grow after the road was laid. The road has been extended/expanded in a mindless fashion whereby, it appears that the tree was inside the road.

And furthermore, this expansion took place many many years back and so, for people who have resided in the Adyar region for many years (I still assume the late Pavit was one of them) this tree wouldn’t have been a surprise.

I am not sure if you have driven through that particular stretch in the recent past, but there are enough warnings about the curves and the trees.

If the popular view is that the tree had to be removed, then the authorities must have evaluated the option of re-planting it elsewhere. What peeved me was that they instantly decided that the tree just had to be chopped down and acted with amazing speed to do that.

The late Pavit may very well be an awesome person and I always feel bad when a youngster has to die in such circumstances. I certainly appreciate the efforts of his friends and family in educating the drivers about the usage of the seat-belt. But I am not willing to accept that it was the tree that killed him.

Thanks for your comments.

Malvika said...

i completely agree with martyn.first of all after d person passed away we shud pay condolences and be sympathetic towards the family n friends.v shud pray for his soul to rest in peace.definitely the tree had no job on the road.v shud not talk about how he was showing off or who he was travelling with for evn u don't know the actual facts!infact v shud salute the family and friends n appreciate them for doing so (seat belt campaign) for even after a big loss they r trying to save others' lives n create awareness.we shud think befor givin any comments and opinions. its my appeal that we shud not make his death an issue.

Martyn SIngh said...

@ Malvika

Thank you Malvika for sharing the same thought. Yes indeed the Seatbelt Campaign is very much alive and kicking. I would be happy if you can join it and support us in this endeavour.

Jawaman

I appreciate the fact that you have undestood the magnitude of this issue. However Im still of the viewpoint that People are more important than trees and trees deserve to be in gardens and parks.

Have a good day

Kingpin said...

Martyn,

Pardon me for intruding in, but you seem to have missed the crux of the post. I would have gone on to elucidate why I think so but Jawaman has already contributed to that.

Malvika,

Not to undermine the acts of benevolence of the authorities and Pavit's family (and friends(?)), but ask yourself this - and only for the sake of reflection - who is making Pavit's demise an issue?

I fully agree with Martyn, Jawaman and you that the tree had no business being there. But, like Jawaman elaborated, it wasn't planted there. Rather the road was layed around it. True, only who is hurt feels the pain, but why vent it on the tree?

I am of the age group that Pavit was and I can vouch for a good number of us in terms of the recklessness with which we ride/drive on stretches the kind at Besant Avenue.

I'm sorry Pavit lost his life, but had you seen the way the car was damaged you'd agree too that the speed was clearly way above what traffic norms permit. And suppositions do not have to mean that Pavit was in fact overspeeding or anything what Jawaman proposes, more so he has done his bit of disclaiming too.

Martyn,

This is likely a bad idea to voice here, but I am willing to take that blame.

We make so much of ourselves as being 'special' or 'unique' only because we are sentient and because we can. Can we have the 'same tree' back? You might argue it's just a tree, but emotion and sentiments aside aren't we just flesh and blood too?

Jawaman,

I have to admit this is a very profound post, especially considering the sensitivity with which you have voiced your concerns.

Cheers.

Kingpin said...

Martyn,

Pardon me for intruding in, but you seem to have missed the crux of the post. I would have gone on to elucidate why I think so but Jawaman has already contributed to that.

Malvika,

Not to undermine the acts of benevolence of the authorities and Pavit's family (and friends(?)), but ask yourself this - and only for the sake of reflection - who is making Pavit's demise an issue?

I fully agree with Martyn, Jawaman and you that the tree had no business being there. But, like Jawaman elaborated, it wasn't planted there. Rather the road was layed around it. True, only who is hurt feels the pain, but why vent it on the tree?

I am of the age group that Pavit was and I can vouch for a good number of us in terms of the recklessness with which we ride/drive on stretches the kind at Besant Avenue.

I'm sorry Pavit lost his life, but had you seen the way the car was damaged you'd agree too that the speed was clearly way above what traffic norms permit. And suppositions do not have to mean that Pavit was in fact overspeeding or anything what Jawaman proposes, more so he has done his bit of disclaiming too.

Martyn,

This is likely a bad idea to voice here, but I am willing to take that blame.

We make so much of ourselves as being 'special' or 'unique' only because we are sentient and because we can. Can we have the 'same tree' back? You might argue it's just a tree, but emotion and sentiments aside aren't we just flesh and blood too?

Jawaman,

I have to admit this is a very profound post, especially considering the sensitivity with which you have voiced your concerns.

Cheers.